Thanks for the pointer to pkgconfig. If you are updating the instructions, you'll need the extra info as follows.
NB: in addition to the files in that zip, you also need two other DLLs as per steps 4 - 8 below:
1. go to http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/binaries/win32/dependencies/
2. download the file pkg-config_0.26-1_win32.zip<http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/binaries/win32/dependencies/pkg-config_0.26-1_win32.zip>
3. extract the files to c:\programs\pk-config_0.26-1_win32
4. download the file gettext-runtime_0.18.1.1-2_win32.zip<http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/binaries/win32/dependencies/gettext-runtime_0.18.1.1-2_win32.zip>
5. extract JUST the file bin/intl.dll to c:\programs\pk-config_0.26-1_win32\bin
6. go to http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/binaries/win32/glib/2.28
7. download file glib_2.28.8-1_win32.zip<http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/binaries/win32/glib/2.28/glib_2.28.8-1_win32.zip>
8. extract JUST the file bin/libglib-2.0-0.dll to c:\programs\pk-config_0.26-1_win32
Meanwhile, getting pkgconfig fixed the cmake step, but now MSBUILD step is reporting errors such as:
libusb-1.0.lib(core.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__iob [C:\local\hackrf-master\host\build\libhackrf\src\hackrf.vcxproj]
libusb-1.0.lib(core.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __imp__vsnprintf referenced in function usbi_log_v [C:\local\hackrf-master\host\build\libhackrf\src\hackrf.vcxproj]
libusb-1.0.lib(core.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __imp__snprintf referenced in function usbi_log_v [C:\local\hackrf-master\host\build\libhackrf\src\hackrf.vcxproj]
libusb-1.0.lib(windows_usb.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__snprintf [C:\local\hackrf-master\host\build\libhackrf\src\hackrf.vcxproj]
libusb-1.0.lib(windows_usb.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __imp_sprintf referenced in function guid_to_string [C:\local\hackrf-master\host\build\libhackrf\src\hackrf.vcxproj]
libusb-1.0.lib(windows_usb.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __imp_sscanf referenced in function force_hcd_device_descriptor [C:\local\hackrf-master\host\build\libhackrf\src\hackrf.vcxproj]
C:\local\hackrf-master\host\build\libhackrf\src\Debug\hackrf.dll : fatal error LNK1120: 5 unresolved externals [C:\local\hackrf-master\host\build\libhackrf\src\hackrf.vcxproj]
Thanks for any suggestions.
Jake
________________________________
From: Dominic Spill <***@gmail.com>
Sent: February 13, 2017 12:13:06 PM
To: Gavin Jacobs
Cc: hackrf-***@greatscottgadgets.com
Subject: Re: [Hackrf-dev] release 2017.02.1
On 13 February 2017 at 11:56, Gavin Jacobs <***@hotmail.com<mailto:***@hotmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I looked at your build output here:
> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/mossmann/hackrf/build/job/2muwvs91hw1g3w6m
>
> My attempt matches yours up to line 97; but on line 98 yours says:
> -- Found PkgConfig: C:/pkg-config/bin/pkg-config.exe
>
> and mine says:
> -- Could NOT find PkgConfig (missing: PKG_CONFIG_EXECUTABLE)
>
> I suspect this is a prerequisite that is not mentioned in the instructions, so your example has helped. I tried to find pkgConfig for Windows, but there wasn't any obvious choice. Which version do you use?
Ah, I see the problem, the build instructions don't mention pkg-config, I'll fix that. I used this version of pkg-config: http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/binaries/win32/dependencies/pkg-config_0.26-1_win32.zip
You will also need to pass the location of pkg-config to cmake, something like this:
-DPKG_CONFIG_EXECUTABLE="C:\pkg-config\bin\pkg-config.exe"
You can see our Appveyor config here, which is probably more up to date than the build instructions in the readme file:
https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/blob/master/appveyor.yml
That includes the download of the prerequisites in the "install" section, followed by the cmake and msbuild steps below it.
Thanks,
Dominic
> ________________________________
> From: Dominic Spill <***@gmail.com<mailto:***@gmail.com>>
> Sent: February 13, 2017 10:08:15 AM
> To: Gavin Jacobs
>
> Cc: hackrf-***@greatscottgadgets.com<mailto:hackrf-***@greatscottgadgets.com>
> Subject: Re: [Hackrf-dev] release 2017.02.1
>
> On 13 February 2017 at 09:35, Gavin Jacobs <***@hotmail.com<mailto:***@hotmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > I have a dual boot computer (Windows and Ubuntu). So, I could use the Ubuntu system to update the firmware, but would I need to update hackrf host on both OS?
>
> That's correct. You can also use the hackrf_spiflash tool under Windows to update the firmware, once you have it built.
>
> > If yes, then I would like to hear from anyone who has actually built the latest hackrf host tools on Windows. The instructions on the git site don't work, so I'm looking for someone who has made it work. And if such a person can be found, can you post the procedure? Or can you simply post the binaries?
>
> I have built the HackRF tools on a Windows system recently and I have also set up automated builds using Appveyor: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/mossmann/hackrf
>
> Could you give more details on what doesn't work with the instructions and I will attempt to fix them.
>
> Thanks,
> Dominic
>
> ______________________________
> > From: HackRF-dev <hackrf-dev-***@greatscottgadgets.com<mailto:hackrf-dev-***@greatscottgadgets.com>> on behalf of Rustu Yucel <***@gmail.com<mailto:***@gmail.com>>
> > Sent: February 11, 2017 10:22:34 PM
> > To: Michael Ossmann
> > Cc: hackrf-***@greatscottgadgets.com<mailto:hackrf-***@greatscottgadgets.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Hackrf-dev] release 2017.02.1
> >
> > Thanks for new firmware! But how about update with Windows OS?
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On 12 Feb 2017, at 05:16, Michael Ossmann <***@ossmann.com<mailto:***@ossmann.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Brian,
> > >
> > > That's great to hear! My guess is that it was the reduction of power
> > > consumption that helped. Have you tried running your HackRF off a powered hub?
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 06:59:15PM -0700, Brian Gieryk wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Before the update, I was running the Hackrf in GQRX on a Raspberry Pi 3B.
> > >>
> > >> Input rate was 1 Msps, I could only run narrow fm, and I could not run DSP and use my mouse at the same time. In other words, performance was all but unusable...
> > >>
> > >> After the update, I can now run 1.5 Msps, my mouse functions, and Wide fm is not great, but it is not overloading the cpu any longer. In other words, useability increased by a factor of 10, at least!
> > >>
> > >> Thank you very much to the development team that made this happen!
> > >>
> > >> Brian
> > >> KE6IYC
> > >>
> > >> Sent from my iPhone
> > >>
> > >>> On Feb 11, 2017, at 15:33, Michael Ossmann <***@ossmann.com<mailto:***@ossmann.com>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Release 2017.02.1 is tagged in git with packages available for download:
> > >>>
> > >>> https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/releases
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> HackRF 2017.02.1 Release Notes
> > >>>
> > >>> To upgrade to this release, you must update libhackrf and hackrf-tools on your
> > >>> host computer. You must also update firmware on your HackRF. It is important
> > >>> to update both the host code and firmware for this release to work properly.
> > >>> If you only update one or the other, you may experience unpredictable behavior.
> > >>>
> > >>> Major changes in this release include:
> > >>>
> > >>> - Sweep mode: A new firmware function enables wideband spectrum monitoring by
> > >>> rapidly retuning the radio without requiring individual tuning requests from
> > >>> the host computer. The new hackrf_sweep utility demonstrates this function,
> > >>> allowing you to collect spectrum measurements at a sweep rate of 8 GHz per
> > >>> second. Thanks to Mike Walters, author of inspectrum, for getting this
> > >>> feature working!
> > >>>
> > >>> - Hardware synchronization: It is now possible to wire the expansion headers of
> > >>> two or more HackRF Ones together so that they start sampling at the same
> > >>> time. This is advantageous during phase coherent operation with clock
> > >>> synchronized HackRFs. See the -H option of hackrf_transfer. Thank you, Mike
> > >>> Davis!
> > >>>
> > >>> - A new utility, hackrf_debug, replaces three older debug utilities,
> > >>> hackrf_si5351c, hackrf_max2837, and hackrf_rffc5071.
> > >>>
> > >>> - Power consumption has been reduced by turning off some microcontroller
> > >>> features we weren't using.
> > >>>
> > >>> There have been many more enhancements and bug fixes. For a full list of
> > >>> changes, see the git log.
> > >>>
> > >>> Special thanks to Dominic Spill who has taken over much of the software
> > >>> development effort and has helped with nearly every improvement since the
> > >>> previous release!
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> HackRF-dev mailing list
> > >>> HackRF-***@greatscottgadgets.com<mailto:HackRF-***@greatscottgadgets.com>
> > >>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > HackRF-dev mailing list
> > > HackRF-***@greatscottgadgets.com<mailto:HackRF-***@greatscottgadgets.com>
> > > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > HackRF-dev mailing list
> > HackRF-***@greatscottgadgets.com<mailto:HackRF-***@greatscottgadgets.com>
> > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > HackRF-dev mailing list
> > HackRF-***@greatscottgadgets.com<mailto:HackRF-***@greatscottgadgets.com>
> > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> HackRF-dev mailing list
> HackRF-***@greatscottgadgets.com<mailto:HackRF-***@greatscottgadgets.com>
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
>